Main stream science is up against the wall these days. Their claim to have discovered a ‘Sacred Cow’; gravity, has been fraught with debate. Over 100 years after first predicted, the detection of gravity waves remains controversial. Perhaps the search for gravity is flawed at its core, if it proves to be an Electric Universe.
Physicist Wallace Thornhill, offers a smart rebuttal to the latest announcement that gravity waves have been confirmed just 9 months after it was reported they remain illusive.
—— Video ——
The Electric force is purported to be 39 orders of magnitude more powerful than gravity. Yet, scientists continue the myth that gravity is the cause of instantaneous ‘spooky actions at a distance’. This phenomena can be explained through understanding of longitudinal waves and the dipole nature of subatomic particles within the matrix of aether.
“Gravity is due to radially oriented electrostatic dipoles inside the Earth’s protons, neutrons and electrons.  The force between any two aligned electrostatic dipoles varies inversely as the fourth power of the distance between them and the combined force of similarly aligned electrostatic dipoles over a given surface is squared. The result is that the dipole-dipole force, which varies inversely as the fourth power between co-linear dipoles, becomes the familiar inverse square force of gravity for extended bodies. The gravitational and inertial response of matter can be seen to be due to an identical cause. The puzzling extreme weakness of gravity (one thousand trillion trillion trillion trillion times less than the electrostatic force) is a measure of the minute distortion of subatomic particles in a gravitational field.”
“Without accepting his model in its entirety, I consider Ralph Sansbury’s straightforward electrical theory of magnetism and gravity to have conceptual merit. Simply stated, all subatomic particles, including the electron, are resonant systems of orbiting smaller electric charges of opposite polarity that sum to the charge on that particle. These smaller electric charges he calls ‘subtrons.’ This is the kind of simplification of particle physics required by Ockham’s razor and philosophically agreeable, though it leaves unanswered the real nature and origin of the subtrons. In this model, the electron cannot be treated like a fundamental, point-like particle. It must have structure to have angular momentum and a preferred magnetic orientation, known vaguely as ‘spin.’ There must be orbital motion of subtrons within the electron to generate a magnetic dipole. The transfer of energy between the subtrons in their orbits within the classical electron radius must be resonant and near instantaneous for the electron to be a stable particle.”
—— Video ——
The dipole nature of subatomic particles with ions of counter-rotational dynamics describes a phenomena known as a plasmoid or ‘packet’ as quantum physics would call it. A plasmoid has also been used to describe our solar model. Perhaps in a fractal universe, the model should hold true in the micro as well as the macro.